1) How did the crowning of Charlemagne as the Holy Roman
| Emperor create tension between the Pope and the
Emperor?

Nebuchadnezzar II is known as the greatest king of the Chaldean dynasty of Babylonia. He conquered Syria and Palestine and made Babylon a splendid city. He destroyed the Temple of Jerusalem and initiated the Babylonian Captivity of the Jewish population.

Nebuchadnezzar II, , was the second king of the Neo-Babylonian Empire, ruling from the death of his father Nabopolassar in 605 BC to his own death in 562 BC. Historically known as Nebuchadnezzar the Great, he is typically regarded as the empire's greatest king.

The Jews thereafter referred to Nebuchadnezzar, the greatest enemy they had faced until that point, as a "destroyer of nations".

To know more about Nebuchadnezzar II here

https://brainly.com/question/8157225

#SPJ4

Many of the period's leading figures were among the delegates. George Washington, who was elected president, was among them, as were James Madison, Benjamin Franklin, James Wilson, John Rutledge, Charles Pinckney, Oliver Ellsworth, and Gouverneur Morris.

The Congress resolved on February 21, 1787, that "a convention of delegates... appointed by the several states be held at Philadelphia for the sole and express purpose of revising the Articles of Confederation."

Delegates met to address the various issues that arose while the newly independent nation was operating under the Articles of Confederation following its independence from Great Britain. The Convention's historic outcome was the creation of the United States Constitution.

To know more about United States Constitution here

https://brainly.com/question/13999176

#SPJ1

Answer:

Federalists

Explanation:

Answer:

Federalist

Explanation:

The federalists were a political group in the early history of the US government that supported the framing of a Constitution that would create a more centralized government. Some members of this group included George Washington, John Jay, Benjamin Franklin, and Alexander Hamilton.

Answer:

Explanation:

A strikebreaker (sometimes pejoratively called a scab, blackleg, or knobstick) is a person who works despite a strike. Strikebreakers are usually individuals who were not employed by the company before the trade union dispute but hired after or during the strike to keep the organization running. Strikebreakers may also refer to workers (union members or not) who cross picket lines to work.

Industrial Workers of the World stickerette "Don't Scab"

Industrial Workers of the World stickerette - "SCAB", "Ode to a scab" by Jack London

The use of strikebreakers is a worldwide phenomenon; many countries have passed laws outlawing their use to give more power to unionized workers. As of 2002, strikebreakers were used far more frequently in the United States than in other industrialized countries

a. This statement exemplifies the potentiality position, which argues that a fetus has all the rights of a person due to its potential to develop the abilities of a person.

b. The statement represents the cognitive capacity position, which claims that full moral status is granted only when a being can think and communicate, which a fetus lacks. c. This statement illustrates the species membership position, which argues that if something is a human being, it inherently has full moral status and rights. d. The sentience position is exemplified by this statement, stating that the capacity to feel pain grants a being full moral status. The fetus develops this capacity around the fifth or sixth month, making abortion morally unjustifiable beyond that stage e. This statement represents a gradualist position, which asserts that early-term fetuses do not hold as much moral significance as late-term fetuses due to the difference in developmental potential.

For more information on  abortion see:

https://brainly.com/question/28459534

#SPJ11

a. This statement exemplifies the potentiality position, which argues that a fetus has all the rights of a person due to its potential to develop the abilities of a person.

b. The statement represents the cognitive capacity position, which claims that full moral status is granted only when a being can think and communicate, which a fetus lacks. c. This statement illustrates the species membership position, which argues that if something is a human being, it inherently has full moral status and rights. d. The sentience position is exemplified by this statement, stating that the capacity to feel pain grants a being full moral status. The fetus develops this capacity around the fifth or sixth month, making abortion morally unjustifiable beyond that stage e. This statement represents a gradualist position, which asserts that early-term fetuses do not hold as much moral significance as late-term fetuses due to the difference in developmental potential.

For more information on  abortion see:

https://brainly.com/question/28459534

#SPJ11

Answer:

The division of the Korean peninsula remained unchanged.

Explanation:

got it right on e2020

Answer:

Its Answer D

Explanation:

edge 2021

After the Axis powers were defeated, a political and ideological conflict between the US and the USSR gave place to the beginning of the Cold War.

A coalition of nations led by Germany, Italy, and Japan known as the Axis powers opposed the Allied powers during World War II.

The alliance began with a series of agreements between Germany and Italy, which were followed by the declaration of a "axis" connecting Rome and Berlin.

The two nations asserted that the globe would now revolve around the Rome-Berlin axis. The German-Japanese Anti-Comintern Pact against the Soviet Union came next.

On September 27, 1940, one year after the commencement of World War II, Germany, Italy, and Japan reached an agreement known as the Tripartite Pact.

It established a defense partnership between the nations and served primarily as a deterrent to American involvement in the fight. Later signatories of the pact included Hungary, Romania, Slovakia, Bulgaria, Yugoslavia, and Croatia.

Learn more about Axis powers, here

https://brainly.com/question/1157476

#SPJ1

Answer:

commander in chief of the armed forces

Three amendments that extended suffrage to new groups of people are as Follows:        

An amendment is merely a correction. It can take many different forms, up to and including the process of changing something via either legislative or constitutional procedure.

Thus, The three amendments that extended suffrage to new groups of people are as follows:

Learn more about Amendments here:

https://brainly.com/question/12124635

#SPJ1

Mahatma Gandhi advocated for non-violent resistance and civil disobedience as a means of achieving India's independence from British colonial rule, primarily through the Civil Disobedience Movement. Option (D)

Gandhi's advocacy for non-violent resistance and civil disobedience as a means of achieving India's independence from British colonial rule is most closely associated with the Civil Disobedience Movement. This movement, also known as the Salt Satyagraha, took place from 1930 to 1931. As a form of protest, Gandhi led a march to the sea to make salt in violation of the British salt laws, which led to widespread civil disobedience across the country. The movement aimed to challenge unjust British laws and policies and assert Indian independence through peaceful means.

Learn more about Mahatma Gandhi

https://brainly.com/question/30222946

#SPJ4

Full Question: Gandhi advocated for non-violent resistance and civil disobedience as a means of achieving India's independence from British colonial rule. A. Quit India Movement B. Salt March C. Non-Cooperation Movement D. Civil Disobedience Movement  

Answer:

There are six types of potential energy: mechanical energy, electrical energy, chemical energy, radiant energy, nuclear energy, and thermal energy.

Answer:

true

Explanation:

Today constitutional monarchies are mostly associated with Western European countries such as the United Kingdom, Netherlands, Belgium, Norway, Denmark, Spain, Luxembourg, Monaco, Liechtenstein, and Sweden. However, the two most populous constitutional monarchies in the world are in Asia: Japan and Thailand.

The Lincoln-Douglas debates were a series of seven debates held in 1858 between Abraham Lincoln and Stephen A. Douglas, who were running for the U.S. Senate from Illinois. The main issue of the debates was slavery and its expansion into the western territories. Douglas was a proponent of popular sovereignty, which allowed the settlers of a territory to decide whether or not to allow slavery, while Lincoln opposed the extension of slavery into the territories. The debates were widely covered in the press and helped to raise the profile of both candidates, as well as to bring the issue of slavery to the forefront of national politics.

In the first debate, Lincoln argued that the Founders had intended to limit the spread of slavery and that the Missouri Compromise had established a precedent for keeping slavery out of the western territories. Douglas countered that popular sovereignty was the best way to resolve the slavery issue and accused Lincoln of being an abolitionist. In the second debate, Lincoln continued to argue against the extension of slavery and emphasized the moral wrongness of the institution. Douglas responded by attacking Lincoln's position as extreme and suggesting that it would lead to civil war.

In the fifth debate, Lincoln questioned Douglas's commitment to popular sovereignty and accused him of supporting the Supreme Court's Dred Scott decision, which had upheld the right to own slaves as property. Lincoln argued that the decision was a threat to the rights of free blacks and that it was the duty of Congress to prevent the spread of slavery. Douglas responded by defending theDred Scott decision and arguing that the Constitution protected property rights, including the right to own slaves. He also accused Lincoln of advocating for racial equality, which he believed was a dangerous and radical position.

In the final debate, Lincoln and Douglas clashed over the issue of citizenship for Black Americans. Lincoln argued that Black Americans were entitled to the same rights and protections as white citizens, while Douglas believed that citizenship should be determined by state law. Lincoln also criticized Douglas's position on popular sovereignty, arguing that it would only lead to more conflict and division over the issue of slavery. Douglas responded by attacking Lincoln's views on racial equality and accusing him of supporting the abolitionist movement.

Overall, the Lincoln-Douglas debates were a pivotal moment in American history, as they helped to shape the national debate over slavery and its extension into the western territories. The debates highlighted the stark differences between the two candidates on the issue of slavery and helped to galvanize public opinion on the issue. While Lincoln ultimately lost the Senate election to Douglas, the debates helped to establish him as a national figure and set the stage for his eventual election as President in 1860.

#SPJ1

Answer:

amazon rain forest

Explanation:

because that the only place in brazil i think

Answer:

I'll go with d of the 1sr question

A) The same-sex couple would not be able to move within the United States and keep their legal marital status.

Correct on Edge 2021

The same gender couples require the legal acceptance of their marriage in all the states because The same-sex couple would not be able to move within the United States and keep their legal marital status.Therefore, option (A) is correct.

The same Sex marriage refers to the marriage practice in which the same gender agrees to marry each other i.e. two men or between two women. It has been regulated by the law in many of the countries.

Couples of the same gender must have their marriage recognized by all states in order for them to be able to move around the country and maintain their marital status.

Therefore, The option (A) is correct.

Learn more about marriage here:

https://brainly.com/question/1412644

#SPJ2

Answer:

Racially focused neighborhoods forming during urbanization.

Explanation:

De Facto Segregation was a term used in the 60's that meant schools would not publicly segregate students, but in reality, school segregation continued.

The Civil Rights Act of 1964 prohibited racial discrimination in public places.

This would not be an example of De Facto Segregation.

The Plessy vs. Ferguson "Separate, but equal" case kept racial segregation constitutional, because it was "fair" in their eyes.

An example of separate but equal is: Black people and White people had to drink from separate drinking fountains, but it was "fair" because both of them technically had drinking fountains.

This is not an example of De Facto Segregation because this is public segregation made "fair".

Racially focused neighborhoods formed during urbanization caused schools to become racially separated. It happened because white people would all go to one rich school in district, and black people who lived in another neighborhood would go to another school.

This is a an example of De Facto Segregation because it caused the schools to become separate without the direct use of segregation.

Answer:

1. Vanuata

2. Feb 13, 1980

3. Oceania, but Australia is the closest "actual continent" if thats what you wanted

Explanation:

Answer:

"As the people of Rome used up firewood, and grains became scarcer due to a rising population, it was the human-environment interaction which led to the political and military decisions to conquer other lands. The location of Rome on the Tiber River is an example of human-environment interaction".

(credits to mvorganizing)

Explanation:

Answer: Sorry your photo is not clear enough to read but when trying to make it out i think it would be B

Explanation:

Sure, the chronologically logical order of the French Revolution timeline is as follows:

1) Estates-General convenes in 1789,

2) Tennis Court Oath,

3) Storming of the Bastille,

4) Women's March on Versailles,

5) Declaration of the Rights of Man and Citizen,

6) King Louis XVI attempts to flee,

7) Execution of King Louis XVI,

8) Reign of Terror,

9) Robespierre's execution,

10) Rise of Napoleon Bonaparte,

11) Napoleonic Wars,

12) Congress of Vienna,

13) Restoration of the Bourbon monarchy.

This is a simplified version of events, but it captures the main turning points of the French Revolution, from the initial demands for political representation and civil rights to the rise and fall of various leaders and factions, and ultimately to the restoration of the monarchy.

The revolution marked a significant shift in European politics and paved the way for future political movements focused on democracy and human rights.

To know more about civil rights click on below link:

https://brainly.com/question/21057720#

#SPJ11

During the Warring States period, various states in China engaged in conflicts and wars. Eventually, one state emerged victorious and unified China.

The Warring States period in ancient China was characterized by intense competition and warfare among multiple states vying for power and control. This period lasted from the 5th century BCE to the 3rd century BCE.

The unification of China was a complex process that involved military conquests, political maneuvering, and socio-economic changes. It brought about a new era of imperial rule and left a lasting impact on the political, social, and cultural development of China.

For more questions on conflicts

https://brainly.com/question/32663176

#SPJ8

Complete Question:

What do you understand by ''warring states were defeated and China unifies''.

The reason that they encouraged American interest in Texas explains the exploration of Zebulon Pike in Texas.

Pike was sent to the Mountains and the southern by General Wilkinson in 1806, but he was alerted not to gain entry into Spanish territory.

Pike discovered Pike's Peak in Colorado and attempted to climb it, but was unsuccessful. Pike continued south, crossing into Spanish territory, where he was apprehended and transported to Santa Fe (in what is now New Mexico).

Pike was one of the first people to visit New Mexico in the United States. The Spaniards set him free in Louisiana. The area he travelled through was mostly wasteland and unsuitable for farming, according to his travel notes.

For a time, this discouraged settlement in the area, but trade grew, and Pike's knowledge of the Spanish military's weaknesses proved invaluable.

Therefore, the correct option is the first sentence.

Learn more about Zebulon Pike here:

https://brainly.com/question/11765713

Answer:

                                                   "A"

The answer is indeed "They encouraged American interest in Texas."

Explanation:

I got it right on the assignment, I hope you do too.

Have a Jocular Day.

Explanation:

How did settling small border disputes, such as that between Sweden and Finland, help Europe as a whole? Nations that resolved border disputes were more likely to cooperate on larger issues.

BOld word help you mark me brinliylist pls

Settling small boarder disputes is good for Europe because Nations that resolved border disputes were more likely to cooperate on larger issues.

Resolving border disputes:

When border disputes are resolved, those countries will have less things to argue and be hostile about which would then allow them to work on larger issues for their mutual good.

In conclusion, Europe benefits when small border disputes are resolved.

Find out more on border disputes at https://brainly.com/question/22145575.

The political strategy known as "appeasement" refers to the policy of making concessions and compromises to avoid conflict with aggressive nations.

Appeasement was based on the belief that by acceding to Hitler's demands and territorial ambitions, the Western powers could avoid another devastating war like World War I. It involved a series of diplomatic negotiations and concessions, such as the Munich Agreement in 1938, where Britain and France agreed to Hitler's annexation of the Sudetenland in Czechoslovakia. The appeasement policy was influenced by several factors, including war-weariness, the desire to buy time for rearmament, and a belief that reasonable compromises could satisfy Hitler's expansionist ambitions.

However, appeasement proved to be ineffective in preventing World War II. Hitler's aggressive actions continued despite concessions, and the appeasement policy only emboldened him to further aggression. By the time it became clear that appeasement had failed, Germany had already occupied significant territories and built up its military capabilities. The policy's shortcomings became evident with the outbreak of the war in 1939 and the subsequent devastating consequences.

In hindsight, appeasement is widely criticized as a flawed strategy that underestimated Hitler's true intentions and provided him with opportunities to strengthen his position. It highlighted the dangers of appeasing dictatorial regimes and the importance of taking a firm stance against aggression to maintain peace and security. The failure of appeasement ultimately led to a reevaluation of diplomatic approaches and a commitment to resisting aggression through collective security measures.

Learn more about Appeasement here:

brainly.com/question/11969058

#SPJ11

Answer:

you got it correct the answer is B

Explanation:

Answer:

I do believe the answer is b  

Explanation:

because they do pray for at least 5 or more mins a day

Answer: Without the help of Spain, the Netherlands, and especially France, it's unlikely the colonists would have prevailed. Ultimately, the Americans prevailed due to their spirit and the fact that they were fighting for something they believed in. Popular support for the Revolutionary War was overwhelming.

Explanation: Hope it helps